Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Delivering The Business Results Utilizing The Right Systems - A Win-Win Ticket For All

By Alden Lemming


As affiliations target their market position, the availability of their services 24/7 is patently crucial. To grow, setups need to be flexible to adapt to changes and also adapt to deliver the changes effectively.

Everybody can deliver, but who delivers quality without any heavy impact will win the consumer delight.

To deliver the business results to the client, it is vital to deal with and track the difficulties, i.e. Service should be of high quality. The difficulties that are found during internal testing or by a customer in live environment must be clarified.

It is important to resolve the problems from the root and refer back to any similar issues (ticket) reported if necessary. All this is achieved with assistance from a good ticketing software system.

But as different software systems can be found in the market, each vendor can come up with its own system design. The problem with a new design is that it's not been tested in real environments.

Whatever testing is done, the real time environment conditions are difficult to simulate. So some sellers are designing their products on the confirmed set of practices such as ITIL framework, which are globally accepted.

ITIL change management procedure minimizes the hazards of exposure, impact and interruption to the service. So a seller which uses ITIL framework basically not only reduces inaccuracy but also saves money and time.

Change Management is among the most complicated parts of ITIL processes and vendors like Vanilla desk have implemented these changes in their product in multiple phases.

In Vanilla desk software, a "Task" ticket type permits to link tasks to all ticket types (Situation, Request, Problem) allowing less complicated management of activities leading to ticket resolution.

Whereas the RFC (Request for Change) ticket type will allow better ticket tracking of attributes express for complex change requests, like build, testing and deployment cut off dates, back-out strategy, etc.

These two different features of Vanilla desk can be linked. For example, the task can be interlinked to the RFC. The ticket types are dissimilar and can be submitted by any person. However , occasionally mistakes might be done while submitting tickets. Hence submitted tickets should be authorized.

In an organisation, a limited set of folks can be outlined as an approver. Predefined workflow (user role or express user) can be defined. As an example, a ticket raised by one dept should not be accepted by another department. So based totally on whichever group the ticket is raised, workflow can be defined during system installation.

Though RFC and tickets are two different features, how to use those features should be outlined in a rule book by the initial setup team. For example, an issue like password change, one-time info research, etc. Can be submitted as a ticket.

But during analysis, if you notice that some changes are required in the product, then an RFC can be made, and the task can be connected to the RFC. Vanilla desk provides change process models/templates so that sellers can customize their product without much headache.

Over a longer time, it's been realized that with effective ticketing software, an employee's productiveness increases, Problems are minimised and addressed correctly.

An initial cost for procuring the help desk software will certainly supply a better return on the investment by benefiting all of the stakeholders of the company.

All of the distinct features of VanillaDesk ticketing software and tested best practices of ITIL framework can easily be set up using ready assembled templates.




About the Author:



0 comments:

Post a Comment